Join for FREE | Take the Tour Lost Password?

deviantART

 

Respect and disrespect

Tue Dec 1, 2009, 9:59 AM
Unbearable Lightness has written a piece in UdA [link] which is really food for thought. It is about photographers who disrespect female models, especially art nude models. In this piece UL quotes my Respect the Model editorial feature, which I wrote for Respect the Model week earlier this year [link] She also quotes the journal by Lady Anais, here on DA [link] in which she recounts her experience at a photography workshop, where someone was evidently only interested in images of her crotch.
There are several issues to be addressed here, all to do with respect or lack of it.
Let us first remind ourselves of what respect is.I shall give here only the two main definitions, according to the dictionary.
1. To take notice of; to regard with special attention; to regard as worthy of special consideration; hence, to care for; to heed [1913 Webster]
2. To consider worthy of esteem; to regard with honor. "I do respect thee as my soul." --Shak. [1913 Webster]
In both definitions respect is given an affective connotation.
With this in mind, let’s examine the issues.
The first one, foregrounded by UL’s own experience of a creepy photographer and Lady Anais’ nightmarish workshop, is to do with disrespect for female nude models, viewed entirely as a means of sexual gratification. It happens more often than you’d think. Only two months ago I was approached by a photographer who wanted me to pose for ‘mildly erotic’ images with a male model, who turned out to be himself. He wanted images of penetration and also oral sex “not real ones of course, but you should make them as realistic as possible” . I do not do any adult work of any kind, I have issues with it, I regard it as exploitative, my model website and my MM page make it very clear. Needless to say this booking did not go ahead, though I wasted a great deal of time on the phone, before realising it was not a genuine request at all. Just imagine. It was meant to be art nude, figure work at that!
Female models as sex objects is of course a subcategory of women as sex objects. It is most unfortunate that to many men women are just that. Recently, I saw a close-up image in someone’s gallery here on DA of a woman’s genital area, so smoothly shaved as to look like a little girl’s. Among the comments posted under the deviation, apart from the praises for smoothness, which I found a bit disturbing, someone – a man - asked the photographer why he had not called it “Woman” - I cannot recall the exact title, possibly "Contours". The photographer had the good grace of replying that if he had given that title many people (i.e. women) would have objected. Indeed. I am referring to this incident because it is indicative of stereotypical male attitudes.
But disrespect to women is shown more broadly and sometimes it is not even thought of as disrespect. Anything that has to do with control (as in wanting to control another, as in bullying) anything that has to do with abuse, both physical - its most extreme manifestation - and emotional, is disrespect of another human being . Women, more often than men, get trapped in relationships - personal, as also working partnerships - which are abusive. My piece for Respect the Model week was not about a Guy With a Camera. It was about a photographer with whom I had worked and whom I loved and respected, who wanted me to feel inadequate about my modelling skills, in what can only be described as a controlling way, and who, in order to do so, took a whole dig at models and what they do with the idea of hitting me specifically. This is someone who would normally be perceived as sensitive, and about whom other models have written that he shows tremendous respect for women – maybe the lack of respect for me is to do with my white hair which clearly makes me a witch, a purveyor of evil,and all witches should be burnt!:)
Verbal abuse is inexcusable, just as hitting someone who is physically weaker is, no matter what the provocation, – and it has to be said that it is women and children, more often than grown men, who tend to be at the receiving end of such disrespectful behaviour.
All this of course is magnified – violence to nude models and violence to women – when you hear of art nude models being raped. Now, that is a very serious matter. Models will not easily come forward and admit they have been raped, just like women, in everyday life, will find it difficult to denounce rape because the assumption is always that the woman asked for it. Nude models as far as the police is concerned are no better than prostitutes. So what if a prostitute is raped? She is there to provide sex, what is she complaining about? Rape is one of the worst experiences a woman can go through. I personally know of nude models that were given a date rape drug during a shoot and were raped. The police did not do much to help. The models are too scared to tell others about it, other than in confidence.
In general, I would say to models: beware of those photographers who are ready to dismiss another model’s performance when talking with you i.e. “she gave me nothing”. They will talk like that about you soon enough. At the very least, if the photographer you are dealing with says such things, he – it is likely to be a he - is someone who has problems with models and with women in general and it is to do with his attitude!
A second issue which I would link with lack of respect is the invasive photography that is often praised for being a wonderful example of photojournalism. “I am a photographer, therefore I document” is invoked as a justification. Jorg Colberg has a very interesting blog about the documentary value of photography, dealing with intent and the photographic image, although for the purpose of this journal the discussion is tangential – to be picked up in a later entry [link]
I realise that what I have just said seems to be flying in the face of all those photographers that are after candid shots and I know that much good photography was taken without the photographic subjects ever knowing they were being photographed. Still, when someone I do not know points their camera phone at me, without warning, simply because I happen to be part of the shot he/she wants, even though it is done perfectly innocently, I feel uncomfortable. I feel my privacy is being invaded and to me that is disrespectful. Is it just me?

I am a member of :iconartistic-nudes-club:
I am a member of :iconno-tasteless-nude: club
I am a member of :iconcameraartsclub:
I am a member of :iconrespect-us:

Nude portraits of mothers and sons

Sun Nov 22, 2009, 9:19 AM
Now this is something to think about. Someone here on DA sent me a note asking for my advice and tips for posing - I felt truly honoured he did. His mother asked him whether he would take her portrait nude, as she would not trust anyone else to do it. "How can I do that?" he wrote. Well, first of all it is such a wonderful thing that she should have asked him. Tips for posing? None, just look at her through the lens lovingly and she will be beautiful. The light is important of course. If you look into the light your complexion glows but clearly there are so many different things to take into account... Then I asked whether he'd consider posing with her. He replied he was not quite sure. I cannot think of a more tender image than that of a mother and son portrayed naked, in all their vulnerability. Mothers often bathe with their babies. They more often than not breastfeed them. The nakedness is a natural state for both. When my baby was first handed to me after delivery I was naked, so was he, looking very blue and bruised from a difficult birth. I loved him instantly. I have pictures of me with him at that moment and I treasure them.
So what would be wrong with a nude portrait of an adult son with his mother?

I am a member of :iconartistic-nudes-club:
I am a member of :iconno-tasteless-nude: club
I am a member of :iconcameraartsclub:
I am a member of :iconrespect-us:

The model as performer

Wed Nov 18, 2009, 4:44 AM
Following my earlier journal Unbearable Lightness :iconunbearable-lightness: expanded on it in her blog [link] stimulating a very interesting discussion, which I truly appreciate (thanks UL for your thoughtful comments). Joseph Crachiola in his comment posted on UL's blog quoted Richard Avedon and I would like to repeat the quote here as it really strikes a chord
"A portrait is not a likeness. The moment an emotion or fact is transformed into a photograph it is no longer a fact but an opinion .... All photographs are accurate. None of them is the truth."
Still, many photographers would like to hang on to the idea of the truth of the moment. And surely in the moment of a shot there is a truth, though not necessarily The Truth. My post was not so much about this notion of truth, it was more about the model and what she thinks and does. About the model as subject, the model's performance. There is a link, no doubt, to the discussion on art and artifice developed by UL, but my question remains slightly different.
Sometimes answers come to us unexpectedly, totally out of the blue.
Quite accidentally I came across the self-portraits by Vera von Lehndorff, while googling something else. Vera Lehndorff otherwise known as Veruschka was famous in the 1960s for being one of the first supermodels. Very tall and striking she worked with Avedon and Penn and graced endless magazine covers till she turned her back on fashion following a quarrel with a Vogue editor who wanted her to "update" her look. And she began a new career as an installation artist and body painter. More recently,she collaborated with a photographer, Andreas Hubertus Ilse, on a series of self-portraits performed by her, a "retrospective revitalization of her alter ego Veruschka". I cannot post any thumbnail from the exhibition but you can visit the online gallery here [link] and be truly amazed.
I think this is the first time that I have ever come across an official acknowledgment of the model as performer. Verouschka has done much to bring back attention to the notion of the model as subject. As Gary Indiana writes, in his 2008 interview with Veruschka "great models can be all things to all people. Veruschka is a true artist because she can be all things all by herself" [link]

I am a member of :iconartistic-nudes-club:
I am a member of :iconno-tasteless-nude: club
I am a member of :iconcameraartsclub:
I am a member of :iconrespect-us:

More on natural, naturalistic and representation

Fri Nov 13, 2009, 9:18 AM
Off to Dublin and looking forward to seeing this great city - I know, I know, Dublin makes me think of Joyce but it is not the same Dublin anymore. Still...
This question about being natural and portraying what is natural has been bugging me. Can one be stylised and "natural" at the same time? The word natural in the way is used by photographers and models is basically a synonym for truthful. So my question really is "Is it possible to be stylised in the way the body is represented and yet convey a truth?" And, conversely, is naturalness also a stylization and as such what is the truth of naturalness?
This is the question artists grapple with, that of the representation of the body and of the subject. A question that cannot be divorced from ideology and the politics of representation, as many writers, especially feminist writers have pointed out. So how do you deal with it in your own artistic practice? (By artistic I obviously mean photographic as well).

I am a member of :iconartistic-nudes-club:
I am a member of :iconno-tasteless-nude: club
I am a member of :iconcameraartsclub:
I am a member of :iconrespect-us:

Being natural

Mon Nov 9, 2009, 4:43 PM
Well I am back, I was not away for very long but the journey was tiring. Being in France made me feel a bit nostalgic about the time when I lived there. I never get that when I go to Paris, funnily enough, even though I did live in Paris. It is when I travel through France that I remember what it is I used to love about it - and still do: the small towns and villages, the landscape of vineyards, the beautiful old churches...
Back home I found loads of images waiting for me, on CDs and also by email. Have started uploading a couple, there's more to come and more shoots too, I will soon be working with :iconmolsmith: and next weekend I am doing a shoot in Dublin. I have never been to Dublin so am rather looking forward to it.
On the train from Nantes I kept on thinking about the issue of what 'being natural' i.e. in front of the camera, really means. I do not seem to have an answer. Everyone understands being natural as sitting or standing 'naturally', without posing. I am not sure though that there is only one way of being natural. Take myself as an example. As an Italian, I use my hands when I speak. That is natural to me. So using my hands when being photographed would never be unnatural. Also through my years of dance training I learnt to hold myself in a certain way. My arms naturally curve, the index fingers slightly move back when I stand with my arms by my side. This might be unnatural to someone else, but feels perfectly natural to me. I think I am natural even when I perform a backbend, because to me that is a natural thing to do. So is 'natural' open to interpretation? Is 'natural' also 'cultural'?

I am a member of :iconartistic-nudes-club:
I am a member of :iconno-tasteless-nude: club
I am a member of :iconcameraartsclub:
I am a member of :iconrespect-us:

Journal History

Shoutbox

*veftenie:iconveftenie:
thank you! :)
Mon Sep 21, 2009, 6:39 AM
=AlexB244:iconAlexB244:
I am too tired to feel sleepy! I was a t a London Fashio Week show and my feet are killing me
Sat Sep 19, 2009, 4:38 PM
=zananeichan:iconzananeichan:
:wave: :hug:
Mon Mar 9, 2009, 1:42 PM
~anarion101:iconanarion101:
Best of New Years to you Alex :)
Fri Jan 2, 2009, 5:48 PM
=AlexB244:iconAlexB244:
Happy 2009 everyone!
Wed Dec 31, 2008, 4:03 PM
~red-bimmer:iconred-bimmer:
Chin up sweetie, don't let him get to you. The responses from everyone say it all.
Thu Dec 25, 2008, 9:20 AM
!SuperiorGraphics:iconSuperiorGraphics:
A Very Merry Christmas. :) :ahoy:
Thu Dec 18, 2008, 11:47 PM
=MarkVarleyPhoto:iconMarkVarleyPhoto:
Shout! Shout! Let it all out!
Tue Dec 2, 2008, 3:31 PM

Forum

There are no threads yet!

Is Rankin Live a way of pushing photography's boundaries or is it only a massive PR exercise (but for a good cause because proceeds are going to Oxfam)? 

78%
58 deviants said I have never heard of Rankin and do not know what Rankin Live is
7%
5 deviants said Rankin Live ostensibly raises money for charity but is only a self aggrandising project
5%
4 deviants said Rankin Live does nothing for photography and is no more than an effective PR exercise and an effective charity fundraising event.
5%
4 deviants said Rankin Live makes the point that celebrities are just people. Rankin is a portrait photographer and it does not matter whose portrait he takes, he just happens to have become the photographer of the stars and the mighty
3%
2 deviants said Rankin Live is an imaginative way to push boundaries as well as a good way to raise money for charity
1%
1 deviant said I support Rankin Live only because it is a charitable event but am not convinced it has any artistic merit.

Site Map